Monday, September 30, 2019

Cameroon's Grand National Dialogue Enters Day II, commissions formed, Team Heads Elected as we Revisiting the Prime Minister Head of Gov't's Speech on the Occasion of the Opening Ceremony


Yaounde Conference Centre, Monday 30 September 2019
  The President of the Senate,
  The Right Honourable Speaker of the National
Assembly,
  The President of the Economic and Social Council,
  The President of the Constitutional Council,
  The First President of the Supreme Court,
  Distinguished members of Government,    Heads of Diplomatic Missions,
  The Governor of the Centre Region,
 The Senior Divisional Officer of the Mfoundi Division,   The Government Delegate to the Yaounde City
 Council,
  Fellow Cameroonians from the diaspora,
  Dear compatriots from the Adamawa, Centre, East, Far-North, North, North-West, West, Littoral, South and South-West Regions,
  Distinguished guests,
  Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am very honoured to take the floor today, on the occasion of the opening ceremony of the Major National Dialogue convened by the President of the Republic, His Excellency Paul BIYA.
I would like to thank each and every one of you most sincerely for responding favourably to the invitation you received to be part ofthis exceptional appointment in our common history.
  I particularly welcome our brothers and sisters who have come from the remotest areas of our country and those who have come from abroad to attend this Major
National Dialogue.
Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
On 10 September 2019, President Paul BIYA solemnly addressed the nation. In his message, he recalled the corporate origin of the crisis that has been hitting the North-West and South-West regions of our country since
2016.
The Head of State highlighted the measures taken by authorities to address the concerns raised by Englishspeaking teachers' and lawyers' unions. He also pointed out that Government's response to these concerns has gone well beyond the expectations of these unions.
However, a secessionist project was added to the corporate demands, leading to despicable acts ofviolence and seriously disrupting economic and social life in these two regions.
It is in order to put an end to these acts of violence, and to enable the North-West and South-West Regions to regain the necessary serenity for the full development of the people living there, that the Head of State decided, in his memorable speech to the nation on 10 September
2019, to convene this Major National Dialogue.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
1 appreciate the historical responsibility we nave towards our children, our grandchildren and future generations. By deciding to invite Cameroon's constructive forces to this Major National Dialogue, President Biya makes each of us fully responsible for the fate of our country.
 We are therefore gathered here to seek to give our national community in general, and our brothers and sisters in the South-West and North-West in particular, a beam of light in the dark night of this tribulation.
We are here to pay tribute to all the innocent victims of the atrocities of the last three dark years.
Allow me, at this juncture, to ask you to stand up and observe a minute's silence in memory of the innocent victims of this conflict.
Thank you.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
The Major National Dialogue convened by the President ofthe Republic to bring together Cameroonians of good will in the same place and space, offers us the unexpected opportunity for a collective start, aimed at finding concrete and pragmatic solutions, far from petty squabbles, to the problems that have separated us physically and intellectually in recent years.
This dialogue offers us the opportunity to find, in the model of the commitment of our country's founding fathers, the strength to transcend our differences and to make our cultural diversity a source of wealth for our people.
Ifhistory has made us heirs to two official languages, English and French, we should use them as a source of opportunity and not as a source to undermine our livingtogether, we should make them levers of our social progress, and not obstacles leading us towards the unknown abysses of division and separation.
From this perspective, the gravity of the situation in the North-West and South-West Regions must challenge and concern us, but above all, it must oblige us all, individually and collectively, regardless of our regions of origin, our political or religious convictions, to achieve a result, that is, to restore peace and tranquillity in these two Regions.
Yes, it is the quest for this objective that must, as everyone knows, drive us during the next four days of our meeting, at this crucial time in our history.
Cameroonians are watching us. The whole world is watching us.
It is now up to us to show how we want to make history: do we want future generations to remember that we were unable to find consensual answers to concerns that are not insoluble? Or, do we want to be considered as true "peacemakers" in resolving this crisis that has deprived many of our children of their parents, their education, and threatened their future, sometimes irreversiblv?  
Our common intelligence and individual responsibility must lead us to defend peace, at all times and in all places, at all costs, and to reject the horror of war, its massacres and atrocities, which penalise individuals and the community in every way.
The ideal of peace, the first element of our motto,  which the Head of State is tirelessly working to promote and consolidate, must be the absolute quest for this important national meeting.  
That is why all components of our nation have been invited to participate. In accordance with the wishes of the President of the Republic, these include representatives of public authorities, international and non-governmental organizations, associations, political parties, trade unions, companies, the diaspora, clergy, intellectuals, journalists, traders, armed groups, traditional leaders and other opinion leaders. In other words, of all men and women who love peace and progress.
The density and relevance of the contributions collected through different channels, during the consultations I have held over the past two weeks and beyond, on the instructions of the Head of State, have enabled me to appreciate the eagerness of our compatriots to work in one way or another to restore social peace, resume economic activities and rebuild infrastructure in the North-West and S outh-West Regions  of our country.
Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
This Major National Dialogue that brings us together  throughout this week will undoubtedly allow us to deepen our reflection on various issues related to the future of our country.
In accordance with the roadmap defined by the Head of State, our discussion will focus specifically on eight
(08) main themes, namely:
e bilingualism, cultural diversity and social cohesion;
the education system; e the judicial system;   assistance for the return of refugees and displaced persons;   the reconstruction and development of the
Regions affected by the crisis; o disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex-combatants from armed groups;  
the role of the diaspora in the crisis and their contribution to the country's development;   and finally, decentralization and local development.
These themes will be discussed during plenary sessions, then further developed within the framework of work in commissions, which will begin this late afternoon.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
The future of our country is in our hands. It is a future that we must all build together, here and now, on the occasion of this Major National Dialogue.
I therefore appeal to the sense of patriotism and responsibility of each and every one of us. Throughout our work, let us live up to the expectations that the Head of State and our compatriots have placed in us.
As the Head of State already reminded the nation in  one of his speeches, we must be worthy of the sacrifice made by our illustrious predecessors to build the Cameroonian Nation, and the legitimate struggle they waged against oppression in the quest for freedom.
It is therefore mindful of our capacity and determination to take up this important challenge, and strengthened by our common hopes to meet the deep aspirations of the people of the North-West and SouthWest Regions, and of all the other components of the Nation, that I declare the Major National Dialogue open.
Long live His Excellency Paul BIYA, President of the Republic, Head of State!
Long live Cameroon!  
Thanks for your kind attention.-

Sunday, September 29, 2019

Program of Cameroon's Grand National Dialogue 30rd Sept to 4th Oct.

NATIONAL DIALOGUE TO EXPLORE AVENUES FOR RESOLVING THE CRISIS IN THE NORTH-WEST AND SOUTH-WEST REGIONS  

PROGRAMME 


SUNDAY, 29 SEPTEMBER 2019: 

Registration of participants at the Yaounde Conference Centre 
Welcome and installation of participants 

MONDAY, 30 SEPTEMBER 2019: 

7 a.m. – 8 a.m.: Registration of participants 
8 a.m. – 9.30 a.m.: Arrival and welcome of guests 

9.40 a.m.: End of installation of dignitaries at the Yaounde Conference Centre 

9.50 a.m.: Arrival of the Prime Minister, Head of Government 

10 a.m. - 11 a.m.: Solemn opening ceremony of the National Dialogue  

Welcome address by the Government Delegate to the Yaounde City Council 
Opening address by the Prime Minister, Head of Government 
Adjournment, group photograph 

11 a.m. -11.30 a.m.: Coffee break 

11.30 a.m. – 1 p.m.: Plenary session: General discussions 

1 p.m. - 3 p.m.: Lunch 

3 p.m. – 4.30 p.m.: Plenary session  

Continuation of general discussions 
Organization of committees and election of bureaux  

4.30 p.m. – 5 p.m.: Coffee break 

5 p.m. – 7 p.m.: Committee sessions  

Supper break 

TUESDAY, 1 OCTOBER 2019 

9 a.m. – 11 a.m.: Committee sessions  

11 a.m. – 11.30 a.m.: Coffee break 

11.30 a.m. – 1 p.m.: Committee sessions 

1 p.m. – 3 p.m.: Lunch 

3 p.m. - 5 p.m.: Committee sessions 
  
5 p.m. – 5.30 p.m.: Coffee break 

5.30 p.m. - 7 p.m.: Committee sessions 

Supper break 

WEDNESDAY, 2 OCTOBER 2019 

9 a.m. – 11 a.m.: Committee sessions  

11 a.m. – 11.30 a.m.: Coffee break 

11.30 a.m. – 1 p.m.: Committee sessions 

1 p.m. – 3 p.m.: Lunch 

3 p.m. - 5 p.m.: Committee sessions 
  
5 p.m. – 5.30 p.m.: Coffee break 

5.30 p.m. - 7 p.m.: Committee sessions 

Supper break 


THURSDAY, 3 OCTOBER 2019 

11 a.m. – 1 p.m.: Plenary session 

• Reading of Committee reports 
1 p.m. – 3 p.m.: Lunch 

3 p.m. - 5 p.m.: Plenary session 

Continuation of the reading of Committee reports 
Review of the Final Report of the National Dialogue  

5 p.m. – 5.30 p.m.: Coffee break 

5.30 p.m. – 7.30 p.m.: 

Continuation of the review of the Final Report of the National Dialogue 
Adoption of the Final Report of the National Dialogue  


8 p.m. – 10 p.m.: Yaounde Conference Centre: Grand Gala Night 

FRIDAY, 4 OCTOBER 2019  

12 noon: Solemn closing session 

Reading of the General Report by the Rapporteur General 

CLOSING SPEECH BY THE PRIME MINISTER, HEAD OF GOVERNMENT 

Sunday, September 22, 2019

State of the Worsening Anglophone Revolution Part VIII; Editorial: “Cameroon Anglophone Liberation War and Crimes against Women, The Time for International Emergency human Rights Actions or Rapid Intervention is Now”


 By Tamukong Roland A. Publisher/Editor
Human Rights Abuse is on the Rise in Cameroon,  as a result of the ongoing war of Independence which has lost focus  with both the Republicans forces and separatist fighters going wayward , multiplying war crimes against humanity daily. Their atrocious actions from the word go has left an indelible mark of pain on the very population they claim to be fighting for their or to restore their territorial integrity. Both parties have taken advantage of the situation to commit all type of outrageous crimes in the name of putting Biya's government and regime on it’s knees. We are all living witness to this sad, pathetic and precarious situation brought as a result of the ruthless change game innitiated by the said liberators or revolutionists. This has or is calling for a serious cause for concern and must be decried in the strongest possible terms using all the powers that be. Reasons why we had to put up this editorial as a call for immediate action or rapid Intervention.
This investigative report, I must emphasis again comes from the firm instructions of the editorial board ordering a succinct and an in-depth analysis on the serious human rights abuse going on in Anglophone Cameroon as a result of the deepening crisis that has caused close to a million persons internally displaced, schools closed permanently for almost three years, human and materials lost unmeasurable.
The socio political crisis that has since ground grounded and crippled the economy of the English speaking part of Cameroon likened to a war of Independence has since gone beyond a war for the liberation of the people of Southern Cameroon to scores settling, torture, kidnapping for ransom, gruesome murder, mess less  killings and mutilation of human parts, most especially those of women.
For the past three years we have seen women murdered in cold blood, we are laying emphasis to the case of Florence Ayafor a prison warden, who was beheaded in Pinyin, Diane Efone burried alive in Kossala Kumba, lifeless bodies found in River Mezam etc. not to talk of hundred cases of women Kidnapped and raped even pregnant ones. The Situation of Yvonne Suoh a pregnant graduate, victim of a forceful marriage caused to be Kidnapped and raped by separatist fighters in Tubah  by said  husband, sparked a serious wave of confusion around the North West social media circle causing girls and women to take to the streets for the powers that be to act immediately.
The above mentioned are few sited cases amongst thousand of such horrible scenes orchestrated by the said separatist fighters. Recently women of the North West and the South West Region in a Pacific March stormed the streets again calling on government and the international community to come and protect the rights of children to education who recently came under attack of separatists fighter today code named “Amba Boys”.
Another set of the population came out recently clamoring for the extradition of activists of the said liberation movement hiding abroad, in the US, UK, Norway, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland, Japan, South Africa and Dubai sponsoring separatist fighters on the ground to be committing atrocities on women and children.
All these tragic scenes,  our dear audience is just a glimpse of the horrible atrocities going on the ground. People have lost billions, farms, cocoa plantations, estates destroyed,  the economy almost grounded yet the international community is not seeing into the plight of Anglophone Cameroonians.
Women are suffering, most are on the run for their dear lives and seeking refuge in neighboring countries, closed aids or family members of victims under countless attacks, wanton arrests order of the day, children hungry, thousands of internally displaced persons are homeless and greatly in need of water and medical attention. The time for emergency humanitarian plus human Rights immediate action is now or Cameroonians should expect the worst in the days ahead.
That is why we of this media house  join our voice with all the other actors and activists on the ground through this editorial to decry the serious  human rights abuses going on in Anglophone Cameroon while at the same time championing the campaign on cease fire and the crusade for peace to be reinstated in the North West and South West Regions of Cameroon.



Thursday, September 19, 2019

"Complains on Anglophone Marginalization Dates Far Back as 1964" Dr Emiritus Fonlon Saw it Coming....

A secret memo by Bernard Fonlon to Ahmadou Ahidjo)
Professor Bernard N Fonlon
Professor Bernard N Fonlon

In 1964, barely three years after the unification of the British Southern
Cameroons and the French Cameroons and the creation of the Federal
Republic of Cameroon, cracks began appearing in the edifice. Dr. Bernard
Fonlon, then Chief scribe of the K.N.D.P. (the ruling party in the former
Southern Cameroons), wrote a secret letter to President Ahidjo informing him that the KNDP was disillusioned with its marginalization within the federation. This letter, which was made public after Fonlon’s death, was definitely a precursor to many other secret and public letters, memos, books, articles, etc., that would be written about the marginalization of the institutions and people of the former Southern Cameroons within the bilingual Cameroon Republic:

We of the K.N.D.P. know the fervour and the determined will that animated the struggle of our people for reunification, and the high hopes that fired this struggle. We have also come to see what this enterprise means to Africa. We are, therefore, firmly determined never to betray unification. We are firmly committed to the federation and we here pledge ourselves solemnly to work for its success. But we know that for it to survive it must live and grow according to definite principles, principles which are not chosen arbitrarily, principles which arise, by themselves, from the very nature of this our national enterprise.

A traveler on the road stops from time to time to look back and see the ground he has covered; merchants close shops at intervals to take stock; users of machines are bound to service and overhaul them now and again. Thus it is the most natural of things for the people engaged in an enterprise such as this to halt, once in a while, to see how much ground has been covered, to draw up their balance sheet, to service or overhaul, if need be, the machinery of the State.

There can be hardly any other moment more self-offering, more natural, more opportune for such a thorough reappraisal than this time, when the transitional period of our constitution is drawing to a close and we are bracing ourselves to launch into the more permanent final stage.

It is therefore categorically imperative for us now to focus the searchlights of an objective, implacable and critical mind on the past three years; it is imperative for us to pass action for that period beneath a powerful microscope, as it were, to see whether we have been building according to the principles inherent in the nature of the enterprise itself.

But before going into that, I would like to stress and make it abundantly clear, in the name of the Central Working Committee of the K.N.D.P., that our desire to get this done is inspired in no way by bitterness, it is not a challenge; our overriding concern, as we have said, is the success of reunification, the health of our Federation. We are moved to this by our profound love for this country, by our deep; concern for its welfare. There is no place here, therefore, for angry recriminations, not to talk of dishonest motives. This is a family gathering; it is not a court of law. Our one concern shall be to state facts as they are, or at least as we see them.
But our seeing may be faulty. There may be other facts which have escaped our observation. We lay no claim to a monopoly on knowledge and wisdom. But we do assert, categorically, that our motives are pure and sincere. Therefore, if our conclusions are proved wrong or exaggerated, we will be prompt to abandon or correct them. All we ask is that in this discussion no question whatsoever should be considered taboo.

As one who wants to rip an abscess open, let us get out the knife and do the job, however delicate the part of the body affected may be. As men intent on a good job of cleaning, let us shake out the carpets; let us probe into every corner. Nothing should be considered too delicate or too sacred to touch.

THE NEED FOR A PERMANENT DIALOGUE

This said, let us go back to the question of whether our building thus far has been based on principles demanded by the nature of the work. It is an important question; for success in dealing with things demands that each shall be treated according to this nature. This brings us once again to the principle of the four causes on which each and everything depends for its being.

First the builders: in this enterprise there are two sets of them, two communities, two political parties divided in background, mentality and methods. If the builders that stand addressed to one and the same task are so different, how can they work in concert, how can they ever begin at all except if they first list down and discuss and agree on the purpose of the building, on the materials to use and on the form the house should take? Unless building is preceded by discussion and agreement, one of two things will happen. Either each party will try to work according to his own ideas and we will have the confusion of Babel re-enacted once again, or the stronger party will usurp the enterprise and reduce the weaker partner to a passive onlooker. When this happens, there can be no other outcome but discontent and frustration.

In fact, this second thing is what has happened and is happening.

Since we came together, the K.N.D.P. has hardly done more than stand by and look on. For, talking sincerely, can we name one single policy in any field – economics, education, internal affairs, external affairs – that has been worked out jointly by the two parties? Can we point a finger at one idea that took birth in the K.N.D.P. and was welcomed and implemented by this Government? There is disillusionment; discontent and frustration are sinking and spreading. There is nothing so calculated to wring and crush the human spirit, before a lofty enterprise, as to know what should be done and yet to have to stand by impotent and see the opposite taking place. This desperation has become explosive.

The K.N.D.P. demands to take a genuine part in the making of this country. Discussion and agreement first on theoretical principles, on doctrine or policy, that is, and then on a definite practical programme based on that policy are absolutely necessary in this coalition, as they are in any other, anywhere, at anytime. They belong to the nature of the thing. Examination shows, as I have stressed above, that there is hardly one single idea contributed by the K.N.D.P. to federal Government policy since we came together. The two parties have never met to define a general policy as a framework for all Government action, or to agree on particular policies in definite fields of activity – economics, money, foreign affairs, defence, education.

Furthermore, when you share in a Government, you share full responsibility for its actions; you share the credit for its achievements, the blame for its blunders. Thus, it cannot be a matter of indifference, to you how this Government is constituted or what policy it espouses. Any Chief of Government or of state picks his team as he judges best; but thus surely does not exclude consultation with his partners in coalition to hear their views about his choice.

Indeed, arguing logically from the premises enunciated above, the K.N.D.P claims it as a right, on principle, as a partaker in this coalition, to have say not merely in the choice of the members which it supplies to the Government, but also in that of those put forward by its partner in coalition. The K.N.D.P claims its say, more especially, over what seats should be given to it in the Government in order that it may be able, thereby, to make a fitting and honourable contribution to the building of this nation. There is nothing extraordinary in this demand: whenever there is a coalition Government, negotiation on ministerial portfolios is an absolute prerequisite.

What then do we want exactly?

In order to close with proposals practical and precise, I will spell out dearly the claims of the K.N.D.P. We demand:

1) That discussion, negotiation and agreement should become the rule in this coalition as from this day, in order to ensure for the K.N.D.P a dignified participation in this Government and an effective contribution in the lion, the elaboration and the implementation of all Government policy;

2) That a general framework policy and particular applications of it in the diverse fields should be defined and adopted jointly by the two parties to give coherence and direction to ail Government action; and that concrete programmes should be drawn up to embody these policies;

3) That a machinery should be set up at party and Government levels for the efficient and effective carrying out of the above proposals; at the party level a permanent committee should be set up where representative from both sides shall meet regularly to draw up Government policy;

4) That the constitution should be revised to provide, inter alia, for a Council of Ministers in which Government projects from all ministries shall be fully, freely and frankly debated before they are submitted to the Head of State a nature in other words, we call for the reinstallation of the principle, we respect the nature of things, we would be: that all Government decisions should be taken in council;

5) That an ad hoc committee should be set up right away to work out the details of these suggestions;

6) That these proposals should be studied, worked out and put into effect before the final dose of the transitional period, that is , before the forthcoming presidential elections.

Such then are the proposals of the K.N.D.P; we hope they are clear and precise.

We shall call upon you, therefore, brothers and co-builders, to hear us with sympathetic understanding. As I have said, again and again, we are not making this appeal in a fault finding spirit. We are making it because of our love for this country, because of our faith in its destiny, because of our concern for this welfare and prestige. We make it because we are mindful of the solemn words of practical wisdom addressed to all builders in the Sermon on the Mount. For, taking heed of that warning, we know for certain that if, in accomplishing the task that history has set for us, we respect inherent, basic laws, if we respect the nature of things, we would be:

like a wise man
who built his house
upon a rock;
and the rain fell
and the floods came
and the winds blew.
and beat upon that house
but it did not fall; for
it was founded upon a rock

But if we shut ear and eye to fundamental principles, if we refuse to do things as they should be done, if we despise and reject the elementary canons without which no partners in coalition can work like a team, we would be:

like a fool
who built his house
upon sand;
and the rain fell
and the floods came
and the winds blew
and beat upon that house,
and it fell;
and great was the fall thereof.

It is by working with these words ringing ever in our ears, it is by keeping them always in mind, that we will be able to raise in this corner of Africa an edifice and a name that will stand the test of time. It is only by fortifying ourselves with the sure and solid wisdom inspired by this solemn warning, and nourished by deep meditation and by an unbroken, fruitful dialogue, that we of this coalition can go forth afresh, and go forth with confidence, to govern and to guide.

Wednesday, September 18, 2019

Six Facets of Anglophone Problem, Governor David Abouem Highlight

THE SIX FACETS OF THE ANGLOPHONE PROBLEM

By DAVID ABOUEM A TCHOYI, Former Governor of North West and South West

Six facets come to mind:
1- Criticism of the centralized state.
2- The transfer of decision centers in Yaounde, far from the populations and their problems.
3- The non-respect of the commitments relating to the taking into account, in an equitable manner, the cultures and institutional, legal, administrative traditions inherited from the former administering powers.
4- The non-respect of the solemn promises made during the referendum campaign.
5- The change of the name of the State: replacement of "the United Republic of Cameroon" by "the Republic of Cameroon".
6- The non-respect of bilingualism in the public sector, although the Constitution makes French and English two official languages ​​of equal value.
I will review, in a cursory way, these different facets.

1) Criticism of the centralized state

.For having been stripped of the important skills exercised, in complete autonomy, the State of Western Cameroon, many compatriots in this part of the territory have developed a deep sense of nostalgia, discomfort, frustration and discomfort. this feeling was accentuated over the years following the advent of the unitary state. This is not simply nostalgia for a dream time more or less past. it is the comparison between the quality of public governance practiced since 1972 and that which was held in the federated state of western Cameroon which leads, systematically, a large number of actors to slaughter the first and to regret the second, many of whom wishrecovery.

restoration
reinstatement
resettlement
recuperation
pickup
re-establishment
this feeling is real even for those who have not known the self-government of western Cameroon as a federated state.
The conclusions of the Foumban Conference of July 1961 can be glossed over ad infinitumit is fair to recognize that it has given very important powers to the federated states, on a list of matters as important as they were to manage autonomously.

the federated states had broad and exclusive competences on important subjects such as the Interior, the Penitentiary Administration, Decentralization, Rural and Community Development, Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries, Public Works, Cooperatives ,Primary and Nursery Education, Energy and Water, Domains and Cadastre, Natural Resource Management, Federated Finance, etc. each federated state had its public function which it managed sovereignly.that of Western Cameroon was managed with the help of the "Public Service Commission", a kind of senior council of the civil service, responsible for ensuring the objectivity of appointments and promotions and the respect of ethical principles in the management of public services. careers.

the management of natural resources by the future federated States was particularly sensitive in July 1961. In separate interviews, J.N. Foncha, S.T. Muna and A.NThey told me that it had been the subject of heated discussions with the delegation of the Republic of Cameroon in Foumban, and then separately with President Ahidjo. they did not want any agreements previously signed with France to be applicable to the federated state of western Cameroon. according to them, it is also in the context of sharing income from the exploitation of certain natural resources (mines and hydrocarbons in particular) that they demanded and obtained that the population figure of each federated state should be clearly mentioned in the text of the

Federal Constitution of 1 September 1961.

Cameroon has been regarded as a constitutional curiosity, with a strong and unbalanced presidential regime at the federal level, but a classical parliamentary system at the state level.

in East Cameroon, classical parliamentarism could not function despite the provisions of the Constitution of that State, because of the unification of political parties and the fact that President Ahidjo continued to exert a daily influence on the management public affairsin that part of the territory he was already ruling as President of the Republic before Reunification. One remembers the resignation of a former prime minister of eastern Cameroon, Vincent de Paul Ahanda, in which he suggested that President Ahidjo would not let him assume his responsibilities.

but in Western Cameroon, parliamentary democracy was exercised fully, in accordance with the Constitution of that State. the elections were organized by an independent electoral commission created by a federal law of November 1961, the first in a country with French in common. by its composition, the mode of designation of its members and its rules of operation, it was really independent of the Executive and the Legislative. Its President, Justice Asonganyi confirmed this to me during an interview in Bamenda.

the government had to be invested by parliament before it took office and it was accountable to it. The two-chamber parliament -House of Assembly and House of Chiefs- was jealous of its prerogatives. President Ahidjo himself, despite all the authority he had, realized several times, especially in 1966.

Following the parliamentary elections held this year, the Kndp had the largest number of deputies at the House of Assembly. But its President, J.NFoncha, hitherto Vice-President of the Federal Republic and Prime Minister of Western Cameroon, could no longer cumulate these two functions, by virtue of a recently passed law. President Ahidjo decided to replace him by Hon. S.Tmuna he considered more federalist than No. 2, Augustine Ngom Jua. But the parliament sent him a firm message that he would refuse to invest in a government led by a minority party. Ahidjo was forced to appoint Augustine Ngom Jua, vice-president of the Kndp, whose autonomist tendencies irritated him.

Incidents have not been slow. firstly between the Prime Minister and the Federal Inspector of Administration for the region of Western Cameroon - it would say today Governor - which he considered to be on its territory. then between the Police, a federated force placed under the authority of the Prime Minister, and the National Gendarmerie, a federal force, which nearly came to an armed confrontation! Actors and witnesses of these incidents are still alive.

frustrations
the fact that all this was suppressed without being replaced, at the managerial level, by something better or even so good, has generated the frustrations and demands of which we are still living today. for example, appointments in the higher administration and the parapublic sector no longer corresponded to a legible rationality, and the anglophones felt marginalized. while, until then, everything was done locally in Western Cameroon, it was now necessary to go to Yaoundé to "follow the files". our compatriots from this part of the national territory came with the conviction that civil servants serving were actually in the service of the users. they were bewildered by the reception given to them by public officials who, despite the bilingual character of the state, forced them to gossip about a scarcely intelligible Englishman, often in the midst of laughter and jeering.

2) The transfer of decision centers to Yaoundé.
the decision centers, once close to the people and their problems, have all been transferred far from these to be concentrated in Yaoundé. consequences: hyper centralization, exasperating delays, multiple inefficiencies in public management, lack of accountability of leaders vis-à-vis the populations they have mission to serve. Two examples will suffice to illustrate it.

the government has decided to centralize at the National Civil Engineering Equipment Park (PNMGC) in Yaoundé all the civil engineering material hitherto held by the subdivisions of public works, in the chief towns of the regions and certain chief towns of the departments . all the machines in good condition of the former Public Works Department (PWD) of Western Cameroon were thus transferred to Yaoundé, to be now rented by the PNMGC. PWD agents, who controlled the rhythm of the seasons, began road maintenance two or three rains before the arrival of the dry season, to consolidate the roadway. So they wanted to do the same thing, the year after that centralization. when they asked to rent gear in the PNMGC, including those owned by them free-standing a few months earlier, they were told that the gear was on other sites; that the tank carriers were broken down; that the "cardboard" confirming the commitment of theirexpenditure had not yet come out of the Ministry of Finance; or other reasons.In front of the deplorable State of the road network which was getting worse, the populations threatened to revolt noisily. It was necessary to go back to the President of the Republic, after having knocked on all the doors without success, so that a beginning of solution could be found to this problem which became explosive. centralization, when you hold us!
Second example: the transfer to the National Water Company of Cameroon (SNEC), the management of water supplies until then provided by some municipalities. This government decision was not even explained to the people. however, the water supply had been realized from their own funds by municipalities and village communities, with or without the support of certain external partners. come to manage it and without having invested any franc, the SNEC took, as one of its first decisions, to reduce the number of standpipes.

In the city of Kumbo, the revolt almost turned into riots. the city's UNC mayor explained that the pipelines had been financed by the beneficiary populations themselves, that they regularly paid their receipts to the commune, that it was dangerous for the health of the populations to deprive them of their rights. drinking water ... nothing helped. a slogan spread like wildfire: "Beware of the snake! It has come to bite and kill. Ironic word game from the word SNEC. These angry populations were accused of "rebellion against established authority". it was necessary to go back to the level of the government so that a solution could be found to a problem of standpipes in communities of the hinterland. Centralization, when you hold us!

Cases of this nature and other matters of discontent have multiplied. it was not, of course, a malicious will of the Central Power, but rather an opposition between two administrative cultures: one, with reflexes instinctively centralizing, and the other, functioning by nature on the principle from empowerment to differenthierarchical levels of organizations.It is interesting to note that the francophone populations, which suffered the same effects of this hypercentralization, did not have the same reactions. Still a cultural problem. indeed, and our anglophone brethren could understand it without difficulty, francophones pose many acts without even realizing that they indispose, and not at all by malice. I take the example of the names of our administrative districts.

when the regions were created in 1962, the administrative districts formerly known as the "Bamileke Region" and "Bamoun Region" were regrouped to form the Western Administrative Region. Rightly, because it was West of Eastern Cameroon. but west of the territory of the federal state was western Cameroon, rightly called West Cameroon. During the transformation of the regions into provinces in 1972, that of the West became the western province, while the eastern Cameroon had just disappeared! our country is the only one in the world where the Northwest and the Southwest are contiguous! Whereas, as our teachers have taught us, between the North West and the South West, extends the West.

To better understand how our English-speaking brothers feel, let's reverse the situation.
on 1 January 1960 Southern Cameroon became independent. He negotiates the conditions of reunification with French-speaking Cameroon. This reunification is carried out on October 1st, 1961.During the negotiations, French-speaking Cameroon obtains the guarantee that the federal form of the state is forever intangible. An article of the Federal Constitution of 1 September 1961 enshrines this guarantee. however, the federal state was terminated on May 20, 1972, and a unitary state was established. From Kribi to Ndikiniméki, from Batouri to Tibati, from Poli to Kousséri .... the populations are now obliged to go to Buéa to follow their files. They are required to speak English. in front of haughty and mocking public officials, who are quick to make fun of them, even those who have never learned English are forced to confuse a Cameroonian who is hard to understand ...
who could honestly say that francophones would have been satisfied with such a situation, to the point of indulging in it and keeping quiet?

3) The non-respect of the solemn promises made during the referendum campaign.

the promises made during the campaign for the "Yes" vote in the referendum and which had determined a large number of voters to vote in this direction on May 20, 1972, have barely been respected. this is particularly the case for the acceleration of development which, in these two regions, should result from the savings achieved by the abolition of the institutions and organizations of the federated States. the agents of the federal government and the party of the UNC had indeed promised the asphalting of the roads, the construction of dams, the urbanization of the cities, the development of the border zones, etc. I personally attended some of these speeches, having been part of the team of the Political Secretary of the UNC and Minister of the Federal Territorial Administration (I served then as director of the organization of the territory in this ministry).

4) The non-respect of the commitments relating to the equitable consideration of the institutional, legal and administrative cultures and traditions inherited from colonization.

Whether we like it or not, British colonization, like French colonization, has produced an institutional, political, administrative, managerial, and other culture and traditions. She has also fashioned ways of reasoning and living. it was therefore necessary to take into account, in a fair way, despite the end of the federal state, this double heritage of the Anglo-Saxon and French systems. The State of Cameroon was committed to it.

Thus, in the aftermath of the institution of the unitary state, the political discourse emphasized the bilingual and multicultural nature of the state. Emphatically, it was affirmed that taking into account the positive elements of our double colonial heritage would enrich the positive values ​​of our centuries-old traditions, the invigorating sap of our progress towards progress. the National Council of Higher Education and Scientific Research, as well as the National Council of Cultural Affairs, organized in

1974, helped to define the profile of this new Cameroonian
It was also one of the strong commitments made by President AHIDJO to S.TmUNA and JN FONCHA, when he consulted them on the immediate institution of a unitary State before delivering his speech of 6 May 1972. These two former Vice-Presidents of the Republic told me so, during interviews in their homes.
in the eyes of some populations in the Northwest and Southwest, this commitment was not respected

.French-speaking compatriots often criticize their English-speaking brothers for their inclination to refer, almost obsessively, to the Anglo-Saxon colonial legacy, as if it was the colonial legacy that was to structure relations between communities long united by ofmultiple links, even before the beginning of colonization.at the same time, they relish with delight to "their" French colonial heritage.our Constitution, our institutions, our administrative organization, our system of decentralization, our financial system, the overwhelming majority of our legislative and regulatory texts ... come from the French colonial heritage. sometimes even, we engage in simple transpositions, some of which can go as far as photocopying, as when setting up the National Observatory of Elections (ONEL).

yet we could - and still can - capitalize on this multicultural heritage, to give our country more appropriate and better standards. Is our Code of Criminal Procedure not there to give an eloquent proof?

this penchant for institutional mimicry has prompted protest movements such as the "Cameroon Action Movement" to affirm that French-speaking Cameroon was proactively pursuing French colonization in western Cameroon. The movement, which originated in 1979 and was probably based abroad, circulated many leaflets in Cameroon, most of them mailed from Canada and the United States. these pamphlets denounced, pell-mell, the marginalization of English speakers, treated as second-class citizens; the Frenchization of Cameroon, in defiance of the equality of the two colonial legacies; the transformation of the National Assembly into a single registration chamber, contrary to whatwas happening in western Cameroon; excessive centralization; the multiplicity and complexity of procedures; the abandonment of development priorities that were those of western Cameroon before unification, with the consequence of slowing development in this partof the territory ; etc.Conscious of the impact of these messages whose media accumulated, President AHIDJO sent to Bamenda and Buea strong delegations made up of members of the government, the political bureau and the central committee of the UNC. their mission was to give back the facts in their truth, to give explanations to the populations, to warn them against the harmfulness of such messages, and to lower the tension. then he set up a high-level ad hoc committee to reflect on the Anglophone problem.

Only three of the members of this committee are still alive, by the grace of God: H.E.MPaul Biya, then Prime Minister; Mrs. Dorothy Limunga Njeuma, then Deputy Minister of National Education; myself, then Governor of the North-West Province. All the others have already preceded us. I will quote from memory: Solomon Tandeng Muna, President of the National Assembly, Chairman of the Committee; Ministers of State / Ministers Samuel Eboua; Sadou Daoudou; Victor Ayissi Mvodo; Emmanuel Egbé Tabi; Namata Elangwe; Christian Songwe Bongwa; Joseph Chongwain Awunti; the MP andAdministrative Secretary of UNC, Thomas Ebongalamé; the Permanent Secretary for National Defense, Samuel Kamé; the Director General of the DIRDOC, Jean Fochivé; the governor of the Southwest; Fon Fosi Yakum Ntaw ....
I was appointed rapporteur of this Committee. Professional secrecy prohibits me from disclosing here the findings, conclusions and recommendations contained in our report. however, out of respect for the historical truth, I must point out that none of the members of this committee have any doubt about the existence of an Anglophone problem in Cameroon.
The work lasted a whole week. After reading our report, the President of the Republic decided to receive, individually, each member of this committee. I remember that on this occasion, he gave me his point of view on the various contours of this question, before asking for concrete proposals on the specific aspects of my province.

recognized at the time as real by the highest authorities of the state, the English problem would have disappeared, as if by magic? Certainly not. Especially since some facts have been added to an already complex situation.

5) The change of the name of the State: replacement of "the United Republic of Cameroon" by "the Republic of Cameroon"
At its accession to independence, the former State under French tutelage had taken the name of "Republic of Cameroon". it was with the Republic of Cameroon that Southern Cameroon negotiated the conditions for reunification. at the advent of the latter, the Republic of Cameroon became the Federated State of Eastern Cameroon, and Southern Cameroon, the Federated State of Western Cameroon, within the Federal Republic.

the change of name of the State in 1984- abandonment of the United Republic of Cameroon and return to the Republic of Cameroon- was perceived in many circles as a simple phagocytosis of former West Cameroon by the former Eastern Cameroon. the most pessimistic have seen a clear desire to remove, even in terms of symbols, the contribution of the former West Cameroon to reunification and the building of a larger nation.

this change of name has also brought home to many compatriots in the north-west and south-west the feeling of constituting a "distinct entity". the one whose populations, supremely, had chosen to find brothers and sisters of another "entity" from which they had been separated, so that both live in harmony and equality. for the extremists, it was therefore necessary, not only to resist "this phagocytosis", but also to perpetuate this "entity" through a name that would recall the history of this part of the national territory. The name "Ambazonia" seemed to respond to this concern.

Where does this name come from ? before Portuguese explorers reached the Wouri and gave it the name of "Rio dos Cameroes," they had docked in Limbe Bay. The saint of the day was St. Ambrose, in the Julian calendar (we are in 1492). they gave this bay the name of "Ambass Bahia", Baie Ambroise. Under the influence of English, this name became "Ambass Bay". This is the origin of the dance whose spelling has been Frenchized to become "ambass-ae" or "ambassibé" or something else. but the name of Ambazonia was not unanimous. Hence the return to that of "Southern Cameroon".

For the sake of truth, it should be noted that the inspirers of this name change were in good faith: I discussed with some of them. brilliant academics freshly integrated into the strategic circles of decision at the top of the state, they were still little informed of some realities of deep Cameroon, and only developing the reflex to summon them when preparing the decisions of the authoritiesin order to guarantee a healthy reception by the different segments of the social body.at no time had it occurred to them to embarrass some of their compatriots. Their reasoning was rather the following.

National unity had been the credo of the public authorities under the federal state and the united republic. the election of President Biya at the end of December 1983 marked the entry of Cameroon into the era of National Renewal. the National Renewal postulating that it was necessary to go from national unity to its higher phase, national integration, this passage constituted a true mutation, which had to be reflected through the very name of the State. the United Republic of Cameroon should therefore "become" the Republic of Cameroon.
The bill introduced on the National Assembly Bureau was worded as follows: "From the date of promulgation of this law, the United Republic of Cameroon becomes the Republic of Cameroon". it is a parliamentary amendment that has resulted in the current formulation: "... the United Republic of Cameroon takes the name of the Republic of Cameroon"; formulation of the remainder incorrect, on the legalistic level. the inspectors of this project did not realize that instead of a transfer, it was rather a return in the name of the State of Cameroon under French supervision at its accession to independence , a quarter of a century ago.

the tabling of this bill caused a stir in many people in the North West and South West Provinces. .In Buea where I served then, I was personally questioned by dozens of people, including UNC officials, who were asking for the meaning, the opportunity and the justification for this return to the pre-Reunification situation. . In Yaoundé, the ministers from both English-speaking provinces were all upset. Many are alive and can testify to it.
Some North-West and South-West MPs even advocated an open sling, and recommended a negative vote. they were all around the Speaker of the National Assembly, the Right Honorable S.T. Muna.after long and animated exchanges, they rallied to the position of the President of the Assembly and other moderate deputies who found it untimely to raise a slinging wind, because of the circumstances of the moment. Their argument was both logical and patriotic. noting that the conflict between the former President of the Republic and his successor had reached worrying proportions, they felt that a wave of rebellion in the English-speaking provinces at that time would undoubtedly weaken the new President, and give arguments tothose who opposed him.April 6, 1984they gave up the sling, but instructed the President of the National Assembly to draw the attention of the President of the Republic to the state of mind of the people in their constituencies, and to ask him to find, with wisdom father of the Nation, a solutionsatisfactory for all.the concerns about this law only faded because of the occurrence, in this troubled period, of serious events: the death sentence of the former president of the republic, and the mutiny of the Republican Guard on 06 April 1984.everyone understood that at such times, the whole people had to stand before their leaders.

6) The non-respect of bilingualism in the public sector, although the Constitution makes French and English two official languages ​​of equal value.
of the six facets of the English-speaking problem mentioned above, which would be insusceptible of solutions? Any ! Absolutely none. So what to do?

History has given Cameroonians a sublime challenge: to build, from the singular path of their country, a united state, capable of constituting a model of integration of the various colonial legacies and its traditional multisecular values. if it succeeds, it can serve as a model or reference for all English-speaking, French-speaking, Spanish-speaking and Portuguese-speaking countries in Africa. It could thus constitute the epitome of African Unity. This challenge can be met. It must be.
however, this can only be done with humility, in dialogue, consultation and cordial understanding. Neither the power of numbers nor the military force can achieve this. Indeed, it is well known, "the opinions are like nails: the more one hits on them, the more one drives them".

no mistake !
Do not make the mistake of taking this problem high. We might have bitter awakenings; or it will be our children and grandchildren who will have it.
When I read the word Boko Haram for the first time in a newspaper, I was abroad. I then asked a Nigerian consultant colleague about this group. With a smirk, he replied, "you know, it's just an insignificant group of illuminated fanatics." in front of the thousands of dead, the hundreds of thousands of refugees and displaced, the hundreds of billions of francs used to fight this nebula, or the suffering without name which it continues to impose, nobody could hold such a language today . What happened ? boko Haram has found support outside. Let's not wait for compatriots who are uncomfortable and who cry out their ill-being, who one day, in despair, come to seek support outside.

We talk well with criminals, to free hostages! Let us discuss with all compatriots who feel the need, to free Cameroon from threats to peace, stability and security.

In the 1960s in France, unitary state and millennium, the Liberation Front of Britain (FLB) denounced what he called the "French colonialism in Britain." trainee in a prefecture in western France, I saw some of its militants brandishing the flag of the FLB instead of the French flag. Today, only historians still talk about the FLB. it is not the result of a war; nor of an embellishment of all the protagonists of the FLB. It is the consequence of a political offer, the result of a republican dialogue.

A few years ago, I was talking to the Dr.ngwang Gumne, one of the main leaders of the secessionist movement, with whom we had served in Bamenda. By chance, we were in Sweden, happy to see each other again. After more than two hours of discussions, he had this sentence: "my brother, as no one wants to listen to us, everyone will eventually hear us". I pointed out to him that he always called me his brother, whereas during all our discussions I was arguing against secession. With a smile, he said: "It's you in Yaoundé who do not want to listen to us".

Let us listen to all the children of our country. without prejudices, as requested by the President of the Republic in his message to the Nation on December 31, 2016. Offer to all our compatriots frameworks for discussion and consultation, to address our problems without bias, and solve them with sincerity in the truth.
what is going on with lawyers and teachers is going in the right direction. But do not limit ourselves to the treatment of what constitutes only manifestations, even mere symptoms. In all its complexity and depth, let us talk about the Anglophone problem. With courage and determination, we must provide satisfactory and convincing solutions. All citizens of our country will benefit. For peace in justice. For the good of the nation. For the sake of the homeland.

David Abouèm in Tchoyi

Consultant
former governor of the Spthen of the North-West;
Former Minesup;
Former Sg / Pr

Tuesday, September 17, 2019

Fru Ndi & Family Face Fresh Death Threats Ahead of Grand National Dialogue from Ambazonia Bombadiers

September 16, 2019

To: The Family of John Fru Ndi
From: Ambazonia Bombardiers
Re: Participation in the Farcical National Dialogue

Sons, daughters, siblings, nieces and nephews, lovers, wives or girlfriends of John Fru Ndi are hereby requested to inform him that he has lived his life undisturbed as such he must allow Ambazonia’s younger generation to live theirs as they see fit.  An Ambazonia who is 25 years old today has at least 50 more years to live--contrastingly, Fru Ndi who is at least 80 years old, has at most 15 years to hand around.  Therefore, it is logical that someone who will be around much longer be allowed to speak him(her)self rather than an old washed-up, non-consequential, know-nothing and ill-informed politician.





Wonjia Palace in Buea Burnt--the Chief of Wonjia did not listen; Fru Ndi beware https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNX5OuKpWqA

Please, Mr. Fru Ndi you are advised to stop the charade or relocate permanently to La Republique du Cameroun (LRC) where you can freely practice your brand of politics, which produces zero outcomes.  You are warned to allow Ambazonia’s Never Again Generation to fight for its destiny.  We are peacefully asking Mr. Fru Ndi to let go, to let us decide our future but he is defiant and doesn’t want to listen.  We are letting Mr. Fru Ndi to know that once he and his SDF participate in the LRC charade announced by the senile LRC dictator Paul Biya, he (Mr. Fru Ndi) shall not be allowed to ever step foot again in Ambazonia but Mr. Fru Ndi thinks it is a joke and is defiant and arrogant.  It is not a joke and when we shall lay hands on Mr. Fru Ndi the next time around, he shall be dealt with accordingly--enough is enough!!!

Monday, September 16, 2019

Ahead of Grand National Dialogue, Dr. Emmaneul Ngwa Lashes "SDF have Failed Anglophone"

THE SDF HAS FAILED THE “ANGLOPHONES”
By Dr. Emmanuel Ngwa
SDF protagonists, let me tell you guys what I personally think about these your preconditions for the so-called dialogue announced by President Paul Biya. I must say that it’s all about a quest for political relevance by your party at this time of the “Biyalogue” amidst the ragging Southern Cameroons Independence war.
The expressions in this your Press Release here attached are nothing but what I often described as political jaywalking and jiggery-pokery. You cannot harvest where you didn’t sow. The SDF has not been in any war with the Yaounde regime to be issuing them such preconditions for so-called dialogue.
The Southern Cameroons people at the beginning of the then crisis recognized the SDF as a party that was originally created to advanced their political plight in the Cameroons. That’s why they beckoned on them to save innocent lives by making a radical pulling out all its members in the Cameroun National Assembly. The SDF, unfortunately, grossly mismanaged this opportunity given to them by Southern Cameroonians. This was a clear avenue for the SDF political jobbers to put themselves in the spotlight of this political imbroglio.
As a young Southern Cameroonian, I grew up to learn from my grandmother and my secondary school history teacher that the SDF was created as an Anglophone Pressure group to politically advanced the interest of “Anglophones” (Southern Cameroonians) as a subjugated and recolonized people within the Cameroons political space. Some historical and political pundits even argue that the SDF’s genuine quest became diluted after its charismatic leadership tasted from the Yaoundé political crumbs, coupled with their newfound hobnobbing political romance with the Yaoundé cabal.
Since then, it is common believe among the people that; the famous SDF party which was founded on the alter of Southern Cameroons human sacrifices has, in reality, become a disguised appendage of the imposing CPDM bandwagon – adopting a national semblance and pretending to be lone strong opposition voice in the polity, always barking but never biting. It’s therefore not surprising that the party, over the years, eloquently ignored the genuine efforts of “Anglophone” nationalist movements like the SCNC and others in their unrelenting quest for the preservation of the Southern Cameroons identity.
In 2016, the never again generation of Southern Cameroonians took their destinies into their own hands, rose up against octogenarian tyranny and the recolonization of their ancestral identity. The response from the regime was, of course, brutal, leading to a declaration of war on unarmed people, which has now claimed more than 5000 lives and culminated where we are today – a call for a “Biyalogue”.
History has recorded that the SDF refused to openly stand with the people and even went as far as isolating its own vocal people-driven comrade MP Hon. Wirba. I can say without fear of contradiction that the SDF and its leadership have largely played the role of “bite and blow” in the course of this senseless war – a more dangerous role than that of their CPDM colleagues who are known enemies of the people. If the SDF had listened to the people from the beginning, the bloody regime would have long been on its knees and more innocent lives preserved.
The defiant, determined and seemingly unperturbed dane gun warriors have succeeded in forcing the limping regime into partially acknowledging a problem it has consistently ignored before now and has therefore called for a so-called dialogue. The SDF midpoint, who are not known as one of the warring independence-seeking revolutionary factions are now at the forefront of giving Paul Biya conditions under which such a Biyalogue should hold. Do they intend to write a new chapter in conflict resolution and post-war settlements?
In my little knowledge of negotiations between two warring parties, the talks are often between the two belligerent parties, mediated by a neutral party on a neutral ground. In this 3 years old Southern Cameroons independence war, the world knows of the Cameroun army represented by the State of Cameroun and the Ambazonia Restoration forces represented by the different independence-seeking factions.
From the reactions of Southern Cameroons Independence leaders who are the ones with the guns and the bullets, it is evident that they have all rejected the Biya form of dialogue. How come the SDF is now at the forefront of issuing pre-dialogue conditions to the Yaoundé regime? Is the SDF by this telling us that they also have a rebel faction among the Ambazonia Restoration forces and have thus accepted the Biyalogue? If not, how do they intend to dialogue on behalf of those carrying guns and fighting for total independence when the party is not a known independence movement? Is it an attempt to steal this Biyalogue opportunity and see how to exploit it for their political aggrandizement?
As I wait for poignant answers to these ringing questions, let all those movements, individuals and personalities keying into the Yaoundé form of proposed dialogue be aware that they are on a fruitless mission. This conflict had longed passed their level. The talking stage where mare sweet soft words could bring back normalcy had passed. We are now at the shooting stage and only those who control the guns and the bullets can talk to each other now on an independently mediated negotiations table. Anytime these two agree to talk to each other, the representation of the “middlists” in such negotiations may again be considered by both belligerents.
So for now, SDF, CPDM, Federalists, and Unionists are all observers in this stage.

Prof. Victor Ngoh Seasoned Cameroon Historian Laud Call for National Dialogue, & Prays it Should not be Politicized

Keep Aside Political Affiliations, Look At National Interest”
Professor Victor Julius Ngoh, Historian, Department of History, Faculty of Arts, Letters, and Social Sciences of the University of Yaounde I.

How do you appreciate the Head of State, President Paul Biya’s message to the nation in which he announced a National Dialogue mainly to solve the crisis in the North West and South West Regions?

It is important to point out that the President’s speech was long awaited. I will like to believe that it came after he must have thought about it very well, analysed the causes of the crisis and the measures which he thinks should be put in place in order to address the crisis. The message was very good, well calculated and he was very composed. He was very conciliatory, provided the roadmap of what is expected. Just the fact that he made it clear that there is a problem and that he has received proposals from various sources. The Prime Minister, His Excellency Chief Dr Joseph Dion Ngute visited the North West and South West Regions, held a series of meetings with various leaders across the board to get the actual feelings of those who are feeling the brunt of the crisis. On the field he told the people that the President has sent him to come and find out what the problem was. He was able to come back and give his report to the President. It was a well delivered speech giving the way forward as far as the solution to the crisis is concerned.

A few days after the message to the nation announcing a Major National Dialogue, how do you appreciate the reactions of the national and international communities?

As far as the international and the national communities are concerned, it is normally agreed that a military solution cannot be used to defeat an ideology. It is better to convince somebody or a group of people with a particular ideology that it cannot succeed and give reasons why it cannot succeed. This is because you can defeat a group militarily but you cannot defeat the ideology. So, in this particular instance, the President has done a fantastic job and on the whole, the national and international reactions have been very positive. I say this based on the reactions from the UN Secretary General and also reactions from the various national stakeholders who are concerned. Almost every class of the Cameroonian society has supported the move. Of course, you should quickly recognise that in every community you cannot have a 100 per cent approval of any project or statement that somebody makes. You are not only a lecturer of History but a historian considering that you have written on Cameroon History.

What do say concerning the form and the nature of the national dialogue the Head of State announced to start at the end of this September?

I strongly advise that a cross section of the population of the North West and South West should be involved. I mean representatives of various groups. I will find it very uncomfortable and I am sure most Cameroonians, especially most Anglohones will also find it uncomfortable if politicians in Yaounde decide to tele-guide those who should represent the various groups. Let people on the ground propose those to come for the consultations and dialogue. It should be a bottom-top approach so that the man on the streets should really feel involved that whatever their representative is saying is really representing him. This is important because since the eruption of the crisis in November 2016, I think Cameroonians should understand this, the local population in various subdivisions, villages have been expecting their leaders to have at least gone down to the ground to call meetings and explain what the crisis is all about, what the government is doing and try to debunk some of the information which some Cameroonians in the Diaspora and some here at home have been saying. Information that is trying to distort actually what the situation is. Without a solid, honest, accurate information, the crisis will just be accentuated.

Concretely, what do you propose can be done for the dialogue to be effective and to produce the desired results which is the return to peace, security, stability and normalcy in the North West and South West Regions?

First of all, we should recognize the intensity and complexity of the crisis in the North West and South West Regions. At the end of the day the solution cannot only be restricted to the two affected regions. You should bear in mind that the crisis has affected the totality of Cameroonians from the political, economic, social and cultural points of view. Those to be involved should be those who have felt the punishment. Take for instance CDC and PAMOL that are completely grounded and workers redundant. It will take years and billions of CFA francs to revive these companies. Government should ensure that those corporations are represented because they will be able to give a direct experience how they have felt the impact of the crisis. They will have proposals which a straight -jacket politician might not have. Therefore groups that should be represented should be the industrial plantation workers, businessmen, religious leaders, traditional leaders, parliamentarians, teachers groups, lawyers, taxi associations, public transport associations and motorbike associations. Because you have to understand that the crisis has been fuelled by the active participation of motorbike riders. Cameroonians in the Diaspora should be invited and should participate. It should not only be restricted to those who are calling for secession or independence because in the Diaspora there are three groups of Cameroonians. There are those who support the federal structure, those who want secession and others who want decentralization. As such, delegations government will be sending abroad should have this in mind. For a successful dialogue, the chairperson of the organizing committee, the Prime Minister should ensure that those who are involved should not wear their political party caps because the crises are not those of a particular political party. The delegates and participants should keep aside their political ideologies, affiliations and look at the issue from the point of the national interest of the country.


Sunday, September 15, 2019

English Cameroon for A United Cameroon Writes Advocating for 10 State Federation Ahead of Grand National Dialogue

NW/SW brothers and sisters,  
Corrupt world organizations and greedy foreign nations that do business with Mr. Biya now support his vacuous call for dialogue on the anglophone crisis. We need to use this national dialogue to prove that Mr. Biya’s government cannot guarantee the barest minimum of our demands, which must include a ten-state federation and his resignation. We can then justifiably push forward with the anglophone campaign for a change of govt and subsequent structured dialogue with the new president. 
Mr. Biya and his French masters are fixated on their failed decentralized unitary state. Mr. Biya also denies marginalization claims. Anglophones must use effective strategies to defend their interests and seek justice for their traumatic experience in this civil war. As being pursued, anglophones are about to embarrass themselves with incoherent demands and continuous begging.
The minimum outcome of a dialogue must be a ten-state federation, development projects, compensation for damaged/stolen property by government forces during this senseless war, allowances for orphans, widows and widowers of civilians killed, and Mr. Biya’s resignation within a year for his past failures coupled with unconstitutional behavior. These are the minimum. Many more demands can be elaborated as in our previous work. Failure to obtain these minimum demands, anglophones must intensify the demand for the immediate resignation of Mr. Biya.  
Let’s look at some of the issues at stake:
1. Marginalization – guilty as charged
a. Mr. Biya stole the presidential victory of our brother, Ni John Fru Ndi, in 1992. This was partly motivated by the view that anglophones are nothing in this country. Mr. Biya’s blatant election theft open the floodgates for illegal behavior at all levels of government. The worst victims of this new culture are anglophones. They are less than citizens, sometimes, inviting hatred from francophone colleagues because of their above average integrity. 
b. Mr. Biya claims there is no marginalization because prime ministers since Mr. Achu have been anglophones. This is his method. He devalued the office of the prime minister so that the token anglophones only act as puppet. Mr. Ngoh Ngoh at the presidency condescending gives orders to the current prime minister who hardly meets with the almight god, Paul Biya. As if this devaluation is not enough, when francophones steal from the govt, the poor anglophone prime minister is also locked up like Chief Noni. 
c. The atmosphere of lawlessness unleashed in 1992 cannot permit implementation of whatever solutions can be found in this dialogue. Mr. Biya must therefore resign for the seed of hope to grow. 
2. Justice for errors of the past
a. Truth and reconciliation in NW/SW regions because of this war. We demand justice for victims and welfare provisions for orphans, widows and widowers of civilians killed
b. Major infrastructure in NW/SW, including rehabilitation and further development of airports as well as construction of a railway line from Douala to Bamenda and Mamfe. Limbe seaport is still awaited.
c. Correction of under-representation in many public and private sectors with slight over-representation before transition to equilibrium equitable opportunities
Observation: Given the dysfunctional, corrupt, incompetent and lawless government structure that Mr. Biya has set up, this rectification of past errors cannot be done in a timely and economic manner. The whole Biya system must be shaken up through resignation of Mr. Biya. 
3. Institutional reform to guarantee welfare of anglophones in future
a. Ten-state federation as compromise between potentially separatist two-state federation and useless decentralized unitary state. Anglophones should stop saying “form of state should be on the table”; we are not begging or debating, we demand it as the least acceptable correction of the gross injustice of 1972. If Mr. Biya is not open to reform the constitution toward that end, we demand his resignation (many prevailing laws were dictated by him to his slavish parliament).
b. Presidential term reduction to five years and presidential term limits to two terms
c. Streamline bureaucracy at the seaport, streamline red tape that frustrates entrepreneurs, dual nationality to encourage investment, functional oversight of government to prevent embezzlement, increased automated payment methods into state coffers, etc.
d. Given the long-term nature of these reforms, all major opposition parties must participate. Mr. Kamto must be released and must take part in these reforms. There is a reasonable probability that he will be the third president of Cameroon.
e. BIR must be dismantled and absorbed into the regular army. This foreign-run unit is a medieval instrument of repression and barbarism. It is also a channel for disportionate channeling of money into greedy weapon market of Mr. Biya’s allies in crime.

Observation: Mr. Biya has neither the desire nor energy to carry out these institutional changes, himself being old and a usurper of power. Anglophones must therefore follow up this inability with a clear call for Mr. Biya to resign.

4. Protection of anglophone specificities: 
a. Greater autonomy for anglophone universities; professors to be hired by universities, deans and department heads to be appointed as in other anglo saxon universities.
b. Expansion of educational institutions following the anglo saxon tradition anywhere in the national territory must acknowledge in certain way, the anglophone contribution to the development of this progressive educational culture
c. Common law courts in NW/SW and at least a bilegal court in every region with competent magistrate. Legal cultures around the world that mix common and civil law should be studied as template for interaction between the two (Scotland, South Africa, California, Texas, etc.)
d. No gendarmes in NW/SW; the mobile wing of the police can be re-established and trained in a humane manner. 
e. Defamation charges should only be civil cases, not criminal in NW/SW regions

Observation: Mr. Biya is an expert in French colonial administration; he is not in a position to understand the logic of these demands let alone entertain their satisfaction. Anglophones must therefore present these demands and proceed to demand that Mr. Biya resign immediately.

5. Ayuk Tabe and co, other separatist leaders
a. We are aware of the sentencing of Ayuk Tabe and co. We want anglophones to bear in mind that their sentencing is much to be envied by those of us who have lost many innocent relatives in this senseless war jointly cooked up by ambazonians and the Biya regime. As for the judgment, by trying to establish their ambazonian nationality, we knew that their ambazonian activist lawyers had worsened the prospects of their acquittal. We will join voices to ask for a reduction of their prison terms to about 5 years as part of the dialogue outcome while we demand immediate release of non-violent detainees with no leadership positions.
b. We ask ambazonian leaders to tell us how the swiss dialogue went or is going
c. Separatists should realize that they have failed us and have no way forward. All international organizations and foreign nations now support the vacuous dialogue for internal resolution of the crisis within the framework of a united Kamerun.
d. We continue to warn against the ill-advised strategy of trying to defeat ambazonians. A recent study reported by Cardinal Tumi confirms that over 69% anglophones blindly support separation. This is in line with our earlier estimate of 70%. That means despite occasional violence from amba boys, the population supports them. The govt forces have prioritized killings over arrests and they venture into areas to intimidate the populations to renounce their support for ambazonia. From the announcement of the dialogue, we demand that all govt forces serving in an area where civilians are killed, be subject to investigation for complicity. All killers, govt or amba will be identified and punished.

Observation 1: Anglophone elite should stop confusing things; those in prison for separation and school boycott can benefit from clemency at the end of resolution of the crisis, not upfront. Some will be set free and others can best hope for a term reduction.

Observation 2: Mr. Biya surrendered the anglophone crisis to the military and his BIR mercernary. They got the message that they can do what they want, including war crimes. Now, Mr. Biya is afraid to bring these soldiers to justice for extra judicial killings, arson, etc. He will therefore deny us the most basic demand to cope with the trauma experienced by our people. We must articulate the demand for justice and compensation with the hope to get a rejection and then proceed to demand very strongly that Mr. Biya should therefore resign.

In summary, anglophones should stop saying x or y should be on the table; we should have clear demands with justification. We know that Mr. Biya will say no. We therefore only want justification for a more unified and amplified call for Mr. Biya to resign immediately. The constitution must be followed to seek the new president for further structured dialogue.

One Kamerun in Peace and Unity (without President Biya, without French colonial intrigues)
English Cameroon for a united Cameroon
sept 16, 2019